I had a read of the article you linked to. As always, there are deep presuppositions behind every statement. One comment Moore makes that struck me as intriguing was:
“What I plead for is to grapple with the entire text from Mt 1 thru Rev 22 on every matter concerning women.”
Wouldn’t Gen 1 thru Rev 22 be more applicable?
I do understand that she’s a Baptist - sorry Baptists, you have a tendency to prioritise the New Testament to the exclusion of the Old. My opinion is that complementarianism is aided by concentrating on the New Testament in these matters (there’s more in there than Gen 1-3, and the male only Levitical priesthood), so maybe that is part of Moore’s problem.
Other comments about protecting power, etc, etc, seem just slanderous (or libelous - if we can call tweeting writing ) Sure, there is likely truth in any accusation, but people deserve better than an accusation without follow through.