Dear Ben and others:
I shared your questions with some Christian Nationalist friends and they were willing to respond. Iâm sharing their responses here:
Brother,
I have not read the referenced paper by men in your presbytery. Iâd be interested in looking at that if youâll share it. If these are the âgut-checkâ questions it evokes, I can tell by this fruit that it must be full of mischaracterization and unhealthy fault-finding rather than a genuine assessment of Christian Nationalism. Be that as it may, I love your church and am happy to weigh in on the scenarios raised.
Scenario One:
If abortion were radically reduced among black and brown communities, I would praise God. Life is life. These are image bearers of God, and any reduction in bloodshed is a cause for rejoicing.
There is no tension between desiring a national culture rooted in Anglo-Protestant tradition and rejoicing in the repentance and fruitfulness of others. If God grants reformation across ethnic lines, our posture must be one of celebration.
Christian Nationalism, properly understood, is about righteousness and peace, not racial calculations. If someone imagines weâd rather preserve demographic ratios than see children liveâthey donât know us. Itâs frankly insulting to suggest it. And itâs clear to me that they certainly havenât read what weâve confessed in the Statement on Christian Nationalism.
Scenario Two:
The concern here seems to be that discussing immigration and demographic shifts will turn young men into hard-hearted ideologues incapable of loving individuals. Thatâs not what Iâve seen. Tanner and I did a podcast on our Christian duty to hate enemies (plural) and love your enemy (singular) that may be helpful to listen to. This distinction comes into play in this scenario as we can hate what mass immigration does to our nationâand speak about itâwhile serving the immigrant in front of us.
We are raising men to be principled and pastoralâmen who can critique unjust immigration policy while warmly welcoming a brother in Christ, regardless of ethnicity. Thereâs no contradiction here. We believe in lawful borders and high-trust cultural norms. And we believe in the full inclusion of repentant sinners into Christâs body.
If a legal immigrant comes into our church, we welcome him as a fellow citizen of heaven and help him assimilate into the dominate culture. Weâre currently doing this with a young Egyptian man. He will start the process of citizenship this fall. If an immigrant were here unlawfully, we would call him to repentanceâjust like we would a thief or a liar. We would encourage him to turn himself in, go back to his own country.
The men of Ref are not confused about this distinction. Theyâre capable of holding both truth and love in their hands at the same time. Thatâs the Christian way.
Scenario Three
This one builds a strange and highly specific scenarioâperhaps too specific. But letâs grant it for the sake of discussion.
If a father is concerned that his daughter might marry outside her ethnic group, heâs allowed to care about that. Scripture allows for love of people and place. But that concern must never eclipse the higher concern for godliness. A regenerate, faithful, Christ-exalting manâwhatever his ancestryâshould be received with joy over an unbeliever with matching skin.
Scenario Four
This final one reads more like a jab than a genuine question, but Iâll still respond.
When we cite crime statistics, itâs not to shame an ethnic groupâitâs to call for order and justice. If white Americans were disproportionately committing violent crimes, weâd be saying the same things. If a study emerged showing that white people were more prone to certain sins, weâd discuss it honestly, too.
The question assumes that ârace realismâ is driven by animus. But for many of us, itâs driven by griefâgrief over disorder, fatherlessness, murder, and social collapse. Thatâs not hatred. Itâs actually love of neighbor. And love compels us to speak plainly when lives are being lost.
Yes, we want assimilation. Yes, we want cohesion. Yes, we want to preserve a Christian cultural heritage. But we also want repentance, justice, and salvationâfor ALL people.
âChristian Nationalismâ is a scare wordâjoined by an ever-expanding list of other scare words meant to keep Christians from loving their own nation, honoring their heritage, or even asking what righteousness looks like at a national level. Weâre being ripped apart by warped views on ethnicity, guilt, identity, and powerânone of which come from Scripture.
In their place, weâve been offered a sterile, rootless Christianity that treats national loyalty as idolatry, border control as bigotry, and love of forefathers as latent white supremacy. But thatâs not the historic Christian position. Itâs not what the Reformers believed, itâs not what our confessions teach, and itâs not what Scripture requires.
We want our people to be just and impartial, yesâbut also rooted, grateful, and wise. We want to raise men who can love their country without worshiping it, prefer their own people without despising others, and welcome the stranger without erasing what makes their household worth joining.
Christian Nationalismârightly understoodâis about bringing all things under the feet of Christ, including governments and cultures. Itâs about seeing the law of God applied with equity and mercy. And itâs about doing that without apology, because Christ is Kingânot just of hearts, but of history, law, borders, and bloodlines.
Happy to discuss further anytime.
âJerry
This is from a lay elder:
Scenario one response:
If this were to happen it would literally change nothing that I do or think. I would still fight and pray for a Christian nation with equal protection under the law and continue to argue for the maintenance of Anglo Protestant culture.
Of course I would rejoice that babies are not being murdered and I can guarantee that even guys as far right as Stone Choir would rejoice that babies were living instead of dying.
I want ALL babies to live and I want my nation to maintain its Anglo Protestant heritage and traditions.
There is no conflict here.
If someone thinks a Christian Nationalist is someone who would rather black babies be murdered so that thereâs less of them, thatâs not only a ridiculous thing to think but very insulting, especially for men like Dusty Deevers (a self proclaimed CN) who have fought for equal protection for the unborn for years.
I personally know of no one who would struggle with this question.
You can want your nation to maintain it heritage and traditions and want all babies to live.
Scenario two response:
The question is making something thatâs actually very simple, incredibly complicated.
It incorrectly assumes:
That talking about the downside of demographic change is at odds with loving those in the body from any race or culture.
I want immigration to be extremely limited, even completely stopped for a long time, by the civil magistrate and so if someone comes into the body who is here illegally, I would require them to turn themselves in to the proper authorities just like I would if a church member stole a truck.
If they are here legally, my counsel to them would be to assimilate to Anglo Protestant culture as much as possible and I would rejoice in them doing that.
We talk about things like demographic change, the difficulty of interracial marriage/adoption, cultural and racial differences etc, on a regular basis and have done podcasts on all these topics while having Black, Hispanic, Asian and mixes in the congregation.
We also have four interracial marriages at church and talking about these thing both publicly and privately has not caused a problem.
Scenario three response:
Here we have a very bizarre situation.
A daughter is sent away all alone to a school (whatâs up with that?) and allows a âyoung manâs charmsâ to outweigh honoring her father to the extent that she has completely fallen for him and will probably fornicate if she doesnât get her wayâŚthis is a young lady that would just as likely marry a Muslim or a Jew.
The whole scenario is asking the wrong question based on bizarre hypotheticals.
The correct question is this: is it sinful for a Father to want his Daughter to marry within her own race/culture and if not, should she honor her father and not allow other men to pursue her?
If you asked me point blank if I would rather have a black son in law who was a solid believer over a white son in law who was an unbeliever, my instant response would be black boy.
The problem with that question is that I will never be in that situation as all of my daughters will know 10+ white Christian boys for every black Christian boy they know.
Itâs an absurd question meant to be a gotcha but it isnât.
Scenario four response:
This one assumes that people are sharing stats about the black murder rate because they have a problem with black people instead of assuming that they have a problem with murder and are seeking to be honest with where the problem is mostly coming from.
For example, a five year old black male is more likely to commit murder than a 20 year old white man.
Thatâs insane and points to a problem that MUST be addressed on a societal level.
Black on white rape numbers are horrific while white on black is statistically zero. Why?
I canât speak for everyone but Iâm genuinely asking these questions because I want a solution and am sick and tired of being gaslit on this issue.
There is something wrong in black culture and until weâre willing to honestly address the real issues, it will just get worse.
Bluntly, if things continue as they are weâre headed for a race war which would be a very horrible situation.
I understand the point of your hypothetical but it doesnât work because studies have also shown that black men are more likely to be gay.
If a study came out that whites had a greater tendency to lack natural affection (one of the sins Paul lists in Romans 1) then other races (which does seem to to be the case) I would absolutely share that and honestly talk about what was causing it!
I think white people are too tolerant by far which is why weâve let some of these problems get as bad as they are and if a study came out that we were the most apathetic race, I would share that like crazy and push for us to do better.
The question assumes weâre just looking for a way to put down black people but what if weâre just tired of black men killing people?
I donât have time to talk about interracial divorce rates which are fascinating but I believe assimilation is possible and often a wonderful thing.
My great great grandfather on my mothers side was a dago who came over on a banana boat and he didnât allow his children to speak Italian because they no longer considered themselves Italian but American.
They assimilated to British Protestant culture and were better off for it.
I want a Christian Nation that honors Christ.
I want my grandchildren to look like my ancestors.
I want societal cohesion.
I want high trust community for my childrenâs children.
I want assimilation for those who are here.
I want my nation to maintain its heritage/traditions.
I want all these things and hate no one.
Hope this was helpful.
God bless.