How to Stay Sane in a World That Rewards Insanity

I clicked on this article because our goal here in Sanityville has always been to help with this exact problem. Hence the name. I was surprised to find something worth reading, and I hope you’ll read it, too.

At one point in the article, the author says, “You need a small group of people who value truth-seeking over status games” This is exactly what I think every time I read a Christian say anything about “winning.” It’s all about status games.

Here are a couple of sections from the article:

The common thread: their extreme positions got them more of what they wanted. The friend who saw conspiracies everywhere built a following. Then an audience. Then a 7-figure income stream. The one who tribalized every issue found a ready-made community that validated every prior. Etc, etc.

The incentive gradient was clear: sanity was expensive, and extremism paid dividends.

We talk a lot about polarization as if it were a disease that infected society, but we’re missing a key data point: polarization is a growth hack, and it works.

It delivers results.

When you pick a side and commit to it wholly and without reservation, you get things that moderate positions cannot provide. You get certainty in an uncertain world. You get a community that will defend you. You get a simple heuristic for navigating complex issues.

Above all: you get engagement, attention and influence.

The writer who says “this issue has nuance and I can see valid concerns on multiple sides” gets a pat on the head and zero retweets. The influencer who says “everyone who disagrees with me on this is either evil or stupid” gets quote-tweeted into visibility and gains followers who appreciate their approximation of clarity.

The returns on reasonableness have almost entirely collapsed.

Here is another quote:

These trades won’t feel equivalent. The losses are immediate and visceral. The gains are distant and abstract. When you refuse to join the mob, you feel it right away. When you maintain your ability to think independently, the benefits accrue slowly over years.

The discount rate on sanity is brutal.

But consider the alternative.

The people I knew who went all-in on extremism got what they wanted in the short term. Some built audiences. Some found communities. Some gained certainty. Most of ‘em made bank. But they’re trapped by their earlier positions. They can’t update without admitting they were wrong, and admitting they were wrong would cost them their community. They’ve optimized themselves into a local maximum they can’t escape. They won the game by its current rules and lost something harder to quantify.

The world will keep offering you bad trades, will keep rewarding positions you know are too simple to be true. Every day you’ll watch people cash in their nuance for influence. Every day you’ll be tempted to do the same. The only defense is to remember that some things compound differently than others.

Extremism gives you a fast start and a ceiling.

Sanity gives you a slow start and no limit to how far you can grow.

Remember: the world only rewards insanity because we’re measuring the wrong timeframe.

Check back in ten years.

9 Likes

Yes - the specific variant on this in a Christian setting is the mindset of “We are the wise, and wisdom will die with us” (a riff on Job 12:2). Which I have seen at work in Pentecostal, Fundamentalist and (some) Reformed circles alike!

2 Likes

Thank you, that was very thoughtful. I propose that Christian “influencers” online ought to follow the apostolic example and make a public point of demonetizing their social media channels to show us that it really is about the message, and not drawing away disciples after themselves. Maybe also publicly sharing analytics would help provide some accountability.

2 Likes

Thanks for sharing this. I think her analysis is true so far as it goes. But I think it misses a key piece of the puzzle, which is that one side of America’s (and the West’s) political divide has been using extremists to accomplish its goals for generations now, and been doing so very effectively. There is only one team that considers totalitarian parties members of its coalition and only one team seriously considers Presidential candidates launched from the living rooms of actual domestic terrorists.

In any kind of politics, this kind of asymmetry can only go on for so long. The Germans weren’t going to gas the Triple Entente’s forces indefinitely without a response in kind.

Is this healthy? Of course not. But it’s as predictable as the sun rising.

Although the piece is obviously about politics, my concern was with the church engaging in this sort of behavior. It doesn’t matter if Satan does it, the church isn’t helped by following his example.

5 Likes