Nathan, when I was in seminary the church I attended hosted Robert Rayburn (see Tim’s article for more on Pastor Rayburn). The seminary students were invited to meet with Pastor Rayburn. Pretty quickly the conversation turned to the topic of paedocommunion. Rayburn lamented that the reformed church had made the Table into a morbid, negative, and individualistic experience. Of course, he was advocating for paedocommunion which, by definition, is a repudiation of the need for self-examination prior to partaking. I told him that I agreed with him that joy should be part of the meal—we are after all partaking of the body of the Lord that was broken for us—but that we mustn’t ever forget that it is a meal that can kill. Approaching the Table with proper sobriety (helped along by the proper fencing of the Table) was undoubtedly required by 1 Cor. 11. I think at that point he made a point similar to yours—that the issue the Apostle Paul was addressing was one of division in the church. The conclusion he and other paedocommunionists come to is that judging the body rightly has nothing to do with individual spiritual knowledge. Rather, to judge the body rightly has to do with not being disruptive at church. So, as long as you are at peace with the brethren—no matter what age—you meet the criteria.
And in one quick stroke, they’ve erased the necessity of fencing the Table, removed what they regard as the morbid and negative element of thorough self-examination, radically reducing the requirement for worthy approach to the Lord’s Table to whether or not you are being disruptive at church gatherings. I suppose that might help with the joyfulness of the supper…but only if repentance is understood to be a morbid and negative element of the Christian life. Perhaps instead of viewing the context of 1 Cor. 11:23-34 in light of the few preceding verses, the whole letter up to that point ought to be considered. The exhortations to the church by the Apostle would put their minds on not merely disruptive behavior at the worship service but factions, hatred of authority, pride, fleshliness, boasting, incest, lawsuits, prostitution, marital intimacy, lust, fornication, homosexuality, effeminacy, idolatry, adultery, thievery, covetousness, drunkenness, causing weaker brothers to stumble, grumbling, sacrificing to demons, disorder in sexuality.
So, while I agree that we should “celebrate” the Lord’s Table, those who live in Vanity Fair, saturated in entertainment, don’t need help in adding joyful celebration to their life. We need help in the opposite direction, just like the Corinthians who knew how to twist terrible situations into something they could celebrate—even incest.
Take notice of the combination of sobriety and joy in Calvin’s Table liturgy:
We have heard, my brothers, how our Lord administered His Supper among His disciples, and in this He shows us that strangers, that is, those not of the company of the faithful should not be admitted. Following this rule, therefore, in the name and by the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, I excommunicate all idolaters, blasphemers, despisers of God, heretics, and all who form separate parties to break the unity of the church, all perjurers, all those who rebel against their father and mother and against their superiors, all fomenters of sedition or mutiny, quarrelers, fighters, adulterers, fornicators, sexual deviants, thieves, lovers of money, plunderers, drunkards, gluttons, and all those who lead a scandalous life; declaring to those that they are to abstain from this holy table lest they pollute and contaminate this sacred food, which our Lord Jesus Christ gives only to His servants and faithful ones.
Therefore, according to the exhortation of the Apostle Paul, let each one test and examine his own conscience, to know whether he truly repents of his faults and is sorry for them, desiring from now on to live in holiness and in conformity with God; and above all, whether he trusts in the mercy of God and seeks his salvation wholly from Jesus Christ; and whether renouncing all hostility and malice, he has the good intention and the courage to live in harmony and brotherly love with his neighbors.
If we have such a testimony in our hearts before God, let us not doubt in the least that He acknowledges us to be His children and that the Lord Jesus is speaking to us, bringing us to His table and offering us this Holy Sacrament, which He delivered to His disciples.
And since we are conscious of much frailty and misery in ourselves, as well as not having a perfect faith, but that we are prone rather to unbelief and distrust, so that we are not entirely dedicated to serving God and with such a zeal as we ought, but we have instead a battle daily against the lusts of our flesh; nevertheless, since our Lord has granted us this grace of having His Gospel engraved on our heart, so that we might resist all unbelief, and He has given us the desire and longing to renounce our own desires to pursue His righteousness and holy commandments; let us all be assured that the sins and imperfections that are in us will not prevent Him from receiving us, nor from making us worthy to share in this spiritual table. For we do not come insisting that we are perfect or righteous in ourselves, but rather, seeking our life in Jesus Christ, we confess that we are dead. Let us understand, therefore, that this Sacrament is a medicine for poor, spiritually sick people and that the only worthiness that our Lord requires of us is to know ourselves well enough to be displeased with our sins and to find all our pleasure, joy, and contentment in Him alone.
That, it seems to me, is wonderfully joyful not because it avoids self-examination but precisely because it promotes it. Seeing our sinfulness we are made hungry for Christ and Christ alone—like the prodigal who, after confessing his sin to God and his father, receives the fattened calf.