Well said, Jason. But…
In arguments about regulative principle, I think of the old saying, “All an Englishman’s preferences are a matter of principle.” In my experience, this is the best way to explain what has long been going on in Reformed worship wars for quite a while now. Weddings or funerals in church or out? Done by ministers or not? Wedding rings or not? Kneeling or not? Lord’s Prayer or not? Instruments or not? Psalter-only or not? Prayer of confession or not? Creed or not? Woman up front helping singing or not? Woman up front leading singing’s beginning with pitch pipe or not (yes, in our local RP church)? Drums or not? Electric assistance with instruments or not? Offering taken or not? E-giving or not?
I’m not going to throw out the basic distinction between Lutheran and Reformed Protestants anytime soon since I believe it gets at a fundamental principle of worship where I am of the Reformed conviction (what is not commanded is prohibited), and opposed to the Lutheran one (what is not forbidden is permitted).
But no, this does not mean I believe I am requiring sacrifices to graven images when I lead my congregation in singing “When I Survery the Wondrous Cross” on Good Friday. Some good souls in my former congregation believed singing about the cross of Christ was idolatry, of the cross. Others thought our prayers of confession were a violation of the new covenant, and this practice was likely one of the more consistent things over which people left our fellowship—some knowing that was the issue, and stating so, while maybe even more not quite understanding what it was about our worship that made them uncomfortable.
After decades of watching and listening to the disparate worship principles among the Reformed, I came to the conclusion it was entirely inconsistent, which means I came to the conclusion most of the hoopla was more a function of preferences than consciences subject to the authority of Scripture.
About holy days. Why did I list birthdays and family days with the Lord’s Day as holy days? Two Scriptures:
But now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how is it that you turn back again to the weak and worthless elemental things, to which you desire to be enslaved all over again?
You observe days and months and seasons and years. I fear for you, that perhaps I have labored over you in vain. (Galatians 4:9-11)
Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day—things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ. (Colossians 2:16-17)
The “day” and “days” referred to above seem to me to fit in with July 4th national birthdays, family birthdays, memorial days, reformation days, days of humiliation and fasting, days of thanksgiving, wedding anniversaries, days celebrating our Lord’s crucifixion, birth, and Death; and certainly not simply sabbath/Lord’s days.
Personally, my conviction concerning holy days is that the New Testament sets us an example without giving us a command. So this is somewhere in between not prohibited and required, and I’m fine with that. Or rather, I believe in that. As I’ve aged, I’ve gotten increasingly tired with young men who neglect camels in their home and church while straining at gnats with a dreadful zeal, then seducing all their smarty-pants friends to become their disciples, joining them in their divisiveness. And yes, absolutely; present company completely excluded, or I wouldn’t be writing here.
After studying it, there’s no doubt in my mind that John Calvin had neither a commitment to exclusive psalmody nor what many consider to be the proper observation of the regulative principle of worship today. The good thing about our Reformed Presbyterian brothers is that they claim they are absolutists, so all I need do is tell them Calvin’s Genevan worship included the singing of the Decalogue.
And that is that.
But go on and examine Genevan liturgy with both Calvin and Knox’s liturgy in hand and you find what, if I were French, I might call a melange. Bordering on an agglomeration. As we have been saying repeatedly, the reformation principle concerning worship was restoring preaching to the center of worship, then simplicity in all things done and sung. (Also simplicity in preaching, I might add.)
What I find telling is that our Reformed Presbyterian brothers have a woman lead their singing (what else would you call it?) by blowing a pitch pipe up front, facing the congregation from the front. Meanwhile, over in Africa, I have it on good authority they have drums and drummers lead their worship. What is blowing a pitch pipe combined with beating a drum other than an organ, I ask you (with a smile)? Put the two together and what I recognize is preference masquerading as principle, and this partly because of its inconsistency. Actually, it strikes me as simple contextualization, which is a good thing. When in Africa, we worship with drums. When among Covenanters who are in America and white and tell everyone they are the real Presbyterians, no drums because if they gave up their American practice of singing (four parts!), were I French I might say they have no raison d’être. And quel dommage.
So back to the argument that the elders and pastor who call the people to join in the memorialization of our redemption through our Lord’s birth, triumphal entry, last supper, trial, crucifixion, death, resurrection, and ascension is (or is tantamount to) forcing the people of God to join the elders and pastor in their idolatry: If we read the accounts of this and similar conflicts during Puritan times (especially those written by Horton Davies) we will be quite sympathetic to their zeal in the matter, and this largely because it was then an issue of freedom of religion when civil authority sought to remove it. But does this mean they discovered Scriptural truths Calvin and Knox had missed concerning the Second Commandment and the regulative principle of worship?
My own answer is no. Just no. I honor them for their defense of worship against the oppression of civil authorities, and I do believe there is truth to the regulative principle of worship in connection with the Second Commandment, and I am on the Reformed side of Protestantism—all the way. But in matters of what the Second Commandment requires and/or allows, I’m with Knox and Calvin in Geneva.
Whenever brittle Reformed brothers want me to adopt Calvin and Luther’s anathematizing of anabaptists today towards, say, Southern Baptists, I take a similar tack—but this time against Calvin and Luther. Baptists today bear little resemblance to Thomas Müntzer’s pitchfork rebels in the days of the Reformers, and so I do not believe we should lump Al Mohler and John MacArthur in with them and respond to them as Calvin and Luther responded to the anabaptists of their day.
Each day has its dreadnoughts that must be sunk. Might I be allowed to say that Christmas has grown awful, and yet doesn’t come anywhere close to what we must prophetically oppose today. It isn’t Christmas that is attacking and sinking the church of our time, but rampant rebellion against authority, rejection of God’s male and female, and the bloodshed of OUR precious children.
I’ve had souls oppose Christmas within our congregation. Also the Lord’s Day, prayers of confession, kneeling and lifting hands (which Calvin said was required by Scripture, but somehow our RP brothers have missed that), but I’ve never had souls oppose Good Friday, Maundy Thursday, Reformation Sunday, or Easter.
Which has been a great relief since I could not live without Good Friday.
Much love,