New Warhorn Media post by Tim Bayly:
Thereâs a fascinating comparison to be made here with both the UK and my own country. No-one in public life in Britain claims to be a Christian unless they almost certainly are. So, when one public figure (David Suchet, an actor) said the following:
From somewhere I got this desire to read the Bible again.
Thatâs the most important part of my conversion
In the New Testament I suddenly discovered the way that life should be lived
One can be sure that it is genuine.
And the public figures in British politics who claim Christianity are usually of a much more serious quality than American âChristianâ politicians.
Something else I perceive whenever âChristianâ this or that starts making itâs rounds through various Christian circles, is how these movements/ideologies seem more like brand names meant to move men and women to do the work of building other menâs doctrinally distinct kingdoms.
I cannot help but notice the conferences, books, studies, podcasts, and other media, and by extension, money, which these movements seem to generate. Am I allowed to judge their motives? Methinks so, especially given how divisive these things become among the body of Christ
Here is an excellent article from World: Itâs Not Too Late to Abandon âChristian nationalismâ
Walker doesnât touch on abortion like you did, Tim, but his assessment is on-the-money. He writes:
Whatâs more, there are no moral brakes with the edge-lords of Christian nationalism on X. As long as one sufficiently opposes woke ideology, feminism, and homosexuality, virtually any other behaviorâwhether brash or insultingâbecomes excusable. Almost entirely absent is talk of evangelism or personal holiness.
I want to be fair and say that the critiques above are not true of all self-described Christian nationalists, but they are a true enough description of many.
And:
Even while Christianity grants the legitimacy of nationhood , Christianity has never required nationalism to thrive. The greatest movements of faith in history have come not through state power but through personal repentance, cultural renewal, and moral leadership. Politics obviously matters, and the law should conform to Christian principles. At the same time, the churchâs strength has always been in its ability to transform individuals and communities, not in its ability to wield political force.
That second quote is the kind of postmillennialism Iâm all for.
Yes, the church has been much better at speaking truth to power than it has been at exercising secular power.