Joseph wants expert-authority data that demonstrates the vaccines are unsafe (which is readily available but it may take some effort, especially being that it is often deleted from mainstream spaces). Beyond the chief need which is to operate upon first principles, not endless data, what is also needed is data that demonstrates the vaccines are safe (which is also readily available). But there’s the rub. Both are available; and that was my point.
Upon what basis do we reject unsafe data and accept safe data? Are men even giving the former fair hearing (Deuteronomy 1:17; Leviticus 19:15)? Why are some quick to apply the hermeneutic of suspicion ecclesiastically but not civilly or medically? Do biblical anthropology and hamartiology somehow not apply outside the context of Christian sanctification? I’m not suggesting a simplistic reduction of good vs. evil. But I am suggesting that dismissing concerns of the unedumacated dumb-dumbs while donning the (selectively forwarded and often contradictory) experts with flowers of acceptance is… oddly Romish, to say the least. I find the ostensible presumption of safety until proven otherwise to be absurd myself and terribly naïve given many things. Too much to get into now. “Conspiracies” and such.
As regards the commandments. The 5th commandment teaches, among other things, those with authority are to wield it for the good of those under their charge. E.g. magistrates, employers, parents, school boards, pastors and elders. Vaccine recommendations and/or mandates come into play here. Especially because the 6th commandment teaches the protection and preservation of life, which would include whether or not a foreign substance injected into the body is safe, or if there is conflicting information about said substance, and, if so, that needs to be noted, not dismissed. 9th commandment concerns the promotion of truth which means both sides in issues of judgment ought to be considered, and we are to inquire diligently.
If you’d like my personal opinion, I think the average Joe can use his own God-given brain, conduct his own research, and make his own decisions about this and that issue, and is not required to follow or agree with the majority expert-authority consensus or practice in these matters (Matthew 28:11-13). Call this rebellion if you like. It certainly packs a rhetorical punch and gaslights tender consciences. But such is to me indication of a prelatic tendency among those with authority, and their being out of touch with a great many common folk, which, ironically, tends to help foment, not avoid, actual rebellion. See the protests in France and elsewhere for examples of such. People are very perturbed.
Do recall at the start of this whole fiasco that there were doctors and other medical personnel attempting to get info out about viable treatments which comports with the aforementioned commandments. What happened? Those videos were deleted. Again and again, from mainstream outlets. A little leaven leavens the whole lump. Yet here we are whining about men whining about masks and vaccines. It’s all very ironic to me. And sad.
Here’s one video to get you started: Dr Sherri Tenpenny Dropping Some Serious Truth Bombs On Ohio Congress About The Covid-Jab Genocide
A brief document: 57 Top Scientists and Doctors: Stop All Covid Vaccinations
Legal testimony of man from previous document: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM
You can search on Gab “vaccine”. It will bring up personal testimonies and “expert” documents, videos, entire groups dedicated to reporting adverse effects following reception of vaccines. 30 people for one man who is not a doctor is hardly unsurprising. The crux is not establishing causal relation, actually. The crux is to establish no pattern of adverse effects after vaccination. Anyone who has studied knows that ain’t happening. Of course we could simply call a spade a spade.