Thank you for taking the time to reply at length. Over in another discussion, @tbbayly writes this:
(emph added)
Do you agree with the statement?
(emph orig)
I do not know how to reconcile a “duty to stop her”–that is a husbandly responsibility as part of his stewardship of his wife to stop her from some grevious public sin–with the lack of coercive power.
Must the husband be consigned to the bottom-right corner of the chart? If such a case would require a longer-form explication, has anyone written such a tome on husbandry?
