If you go back and read my comment you’ll see that I’m not making any kind of case for a broad anthropology but simply what a response to a particular sin is likely to be in sinful men.
It’s sort of like saying that the man that refuses to discipline his children because his own father beat him is going to have disobedient children. Or even more apropos, recognizing that as those children get more and more irritating to him, he may well “snap” and do something abusive. There are obviously other sinful and righteous ways he could respond, but I don’t think there’s anything objectionable about the observation.